Responses and Follow-Ups
Follow Up on a Delayed Accommodation Request
A fully-written letter you can copy or download. Below the letter we explain why it is written the way it is, the mistakes most people make, and the legal authorities the language invokes.
The letter
▸Show full letterHide letter
To: HR at [Employer Name] From: [Your Full Name] Date: [Today's Date] Subject: Follow Up on Accommodation Request Submitted [Date of Original Request] Dear [HR Contact Name], I am following up on my reasonable accommodation request, which I submitted on [Date of Original Request] (copy attached). As of today, [Number] business days have passed since my request. I have not received: 1. An acknowledgment of the specific accommodations I requested. 2. A proposed meeting date to discuss the request. 3. A decision on any of the accommodations. 4. A written request for additional medical documentation. To move this forward, I am asking for: 1. Written acknowledgment of my original request, listing each accommodation I asked for. 2. A meeting to discuss the request within the next seven business days. 3. If additional medical documentation is needed, a written description of exactly what is needed so my doctor or therapist can respond. I am still happy to engage in good faith to find accommodations that work for both me and the employer. Please confirm receipt of this follow-up and propose a meeting within five business days. Thank you, [Your Full Name] [Your Work Email] [Your Phone Number] Attachment: Original accommodation request dated [Date]
Replace every bracketed prompt with your own information before sending. Everything in brackets is for you. Everything outside brackets is the letter.
When to use this letter
You sent an accommodation request. Silence. Two weeks have passed and HR has neither scheduled a meeting nor acknowledged the substance of your request. You want to create a clean record of delay while keeping the conversation open.
Delay is the most common way employers fail the ADA without ever denying a request outright. The regulation does not set a specific timeline, but EEOC guidance is clear that 'undue delay' itself can constitute a failure to accommodate.
This letter does three things: documents the original request and the silence, asks for a written acknowledgment, and sets a firm new deadline. After this letter, delay is harder to defend.
Why the letter is written this way
Each paragraph is doing specific legal work.
- 01
Why attach the original request
HR cannot credibly claim 'we did not receive it' or 'we thought you were asking for something else' if the original is attached. The attachment is the difference between a follow-up and a new request.
- 02
Why enumerate what was not received
Listing the four specific things you have not received (acknowledgment, meeting date, decision, documentation request) converts vague 'they haven't responded' into a documented list of failures. Each item is a specific obligation under the regulation.
- 03
Why ask for a written documentation request
One of the most common stall tactics is 'we are waiting for more information from your provider' without ever specifying what. Forcing a written list of what is needed closes that loophole.
- 04
Why ask for a meeting in seven business days
A short, specific deadline creates a new benchmark. If the employer misses this one too, you have cleaner evidence of undue delay for an EEOC charge or future litigation.
- 05
Why keep the tone open and constructive
Even a follow-up letter is part of the record. A constructive tone preserves the case that you were the reasonable party throughout, which matters if the employer later argues you were the one who refused to engage.
Don't do this
The mistakes that undo the letter.
- 01Calling HR multiple times without sending anything in writing. Verbal follow-ups do not create a record.
- 02Not attaching the original request. Without it, HR can reframe the history of the request.
- 03Setting a deadline that is too aggressive (24-48 hours). Courts look for reasonableness; five to seven business days is both firm and defensible.
- 04Including personal frustration in the letter. Stick to the regulation, the timeline, and the ask.
- 05Not sending the letter by email with a read receipt or delivery confirmation. Proof of sending matters as much as proof of drafting.
Legal authorities cited
The language invokes real regulations.
- 42 U.S.C. § 12112
- ADA Title I discrimination prohibition
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3)
- Interactive process requirement
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(c)
- Medical documentation requirements
- EEOC Enforcement Guidance No. 915.002
- Undue delay as failure to accommodate
- Cowell v. Illinois Dep't of Human Services, 2024 WL 551891 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2024)
- Delay supporting ADA interference claim
Keep reading
