ADA Accommodation Requests
ADA Reasonable Accommodations for Mental Health
A fully-written letter you can copy or download. Below the letter we explain why it is written the way it is, the mistakes most people make, and the legal authorities the language invokes.
The letter
▸Show full letterHide letter
To: HR at [Employer Name] From: [Your Full Name] Date: [Today's Date] Subject: Request for Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA Dear [HR Contact Name], I am writing to request reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act for a qualifying mental health condition. I can perform the essential functions of my position as [Your Job Title] and am asking for specific adjustments that will allow me to continue doing so sustainably. I am also formally asking that we engage in the interactive process to identify reasonable accommodations. The specific accommodations I am requesting are: 1. A flexible start time of up to sixty minutes, to account for mornings when medication side effects or sleep disruption make my usual start time impracticable. I will be available remotely for any meetings scheduled before my usual start time. 2. A consistent weekly therapy appointment during business hours (currently [Day] at [Time]), with schedule flexibility so I can make up the time later that day or week. 3. A quiet space or permission to use noise-canceling headphones during focus work. High-stimulation environments trigger symptoms that reduce my productivity and safety. 4. Written communication from my supervisor for performance expectations, changes in priorities, or negative feedback, instead of verbal-only delivery. Written instructions reduce the cognitive load of holding and acting on complex verbal directions during symptomatic periods. 5. At least one business day of advance notice for non-routine meetings, so I can prepare and manage symptom timing. These requests are based on my healthcare provider's recommendations. I am happy to provide medical documentation of my functional limitations. I am not required to disclose a specific diagnosis, and any documentation you receive should be kept in a confidential file separate from my personnel file. I understand the employer has the right to choose among effective accommodations. I am open to alternatives that address the same functional needs and am willing to meet to discuss them. Please propose a meeting within ten business days. Thank you. Sincerely, [Your Full Name] [Your Work Email] [Your Phone Number]
Replace every bracketed prompt with your own information before sending. Everything in brackets is for you. Everything outside brackets is the letter.
When to use this letter
You are able to do your job but need specific adjustments to work sustainably with a mental health condition. You are asking for reasonable accommodations under the ADA, not for leave. You want your employer to engage in the interactive process.
The ADA is not just for people on leave. It is a tool to adjust how the work gets done so that a qualified employee with a disability can keep doing it. This letter formally puts your employer on notice that you have a disability and that you are requesting accommodations, which starts the interactive process under 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3).
You do not need to use the words 'reasonable accommodation' or 'ADA' to invoke these rights. But using them in writing creates a clean paper trail and makes it much harder for an employer to later claim they did not know you were asking.
Why the letter is written this way
Each paragraph is doing specific legal work.
- 01
Why lead with essential functions
The ADA only protects a 'qualified individual,' meaning someone who can perform the essential functions of the job with or without accommodation (42 U.S.C. § 12111(8)). Opening by affirming that you can perform essentials removes one of the employer's most common defenses at the start.
- 02
Why number the specific accommodations
A clear numbered list creates five discrete items the employer must respond to. If HR later says 'we considered your request,' you can ask 'which of the five, specifically?' Vague accommodation asks invite vague denials.
- 03
Why name the interactive process regulation
29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3) obligates the employer to engage in an informal interactive process. Naming this in writing is what converts 'I asked HR for something' into 'I invoked the interactive process.' Courts treat the difference as meaningful when evaluating whether the employer acted in good faith.
- 04
Why offer to provide documentation without disclosing a diagnosis
Under 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(c), medical documentation is limited to what is necessary to establish a disability and the need for accommodation. You do not need to reveal your specific diagnosis. A letter from your provider describing functional limitations is enough.
- 05
Why acknowledge the employer's choice of accommodation
29 C.F.R. § 1630.9 gives the employer discretion to choose among effective alternatives. Acknowledging this in writing signals good faith and makes an employer denial on 'preference' grounds look unreasonable in contrast.
Don't do this
The mistakes that undo the letter.
- 01Asking for 'whatever you can do' instead of specific items. Vagueness makes denial easy and proof of failure-to-accommodate difficult.
- 02Disclosing a specific diagnosis to justify the request. You only need to establish that you have a qualifying disability and that the accommodations address functional limitations.
- 03Waiting until after a performance review to make the request. Requests made after discipline look defensive. A request made before discipline is cleaner evidence of good faith.
- 04Accepting a verbal 'sure, we can work something out' without a written accommodation agreement. Verbal accommodations evaporate with turnover. Ask for confirmation in writing.
- 05Submitting the request only to a supervisor. Supervisors can trigger the interactive process, but HR is the safer venue because the request enters the official record immediately.
- 06Skipping a deadline. Asking for a response by a specific date (for example, ten business days) creates a benchmark for failure-to-engage in the interactive process under Cowell v. Illinois Dep't of Human Services (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Legal authorities cited
The language invokes real regulations.
- 42 U.S.C. § 12111(8)
- Definition of qualified individual
- 42 U.S.C. § 12112
- ADA Title I discrimination prohibition
- 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(3)(B)
- Confidentiality of medical information
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3)
- Interactive process
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.9
- Employer's choice among effective accommodations
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(c)
- Medical examinations and inquiries
- EEOC Enforcement Guidance No. 915.002
- No magic words rule
Keep reading
